|
|
|
Corrective Action
By: Neal Stiemert
Corrective Action
One of the requirements of the ISO 9001:2000 standard is corrective action. The
corrective action process is one opportunity to make permanent improvements in our
processes if we perform corrective action as intended. The intention of corrective action
is to identify our problem areas, correct them and put controls in place to prevent
re-occurence. I recommend doing an ongoing trend analysis of the root cause of
nonconformities to reveal if we are really doing corrective action or just putting band
aids on our problems.
As an auditor, I write a very large number of audit findings against the corrective
action process.
Typical audit findings are:
- Corrective actions closed without effectiveness verification.
- No due date assigned for closure of corrective action.
- Corrective actions not completed by the due date.
ISO Requirement:
(Key requirements are italicized)
The organization shall take action to eliminate the cause of nonconformities in
order to prevent recurrence. Corrective actions shall be appropriate to the
effects of the nonconformities encountered. A documented procedure shall be established
to define requirements for…
- reviewing nonconformities (including customer complaints),
- determining the causes of nonconformities,
- evaluating the need for action to ensure that nonconformities do not recur,
- determining and implementing action needed,
- recording results of action taken (see 4.2.4), and
- reviewing corrective action taken.
Corrective Action
Acme takes corrective action to eliminate the cause of nonconformities in order to prevent
recurrence. Corrective action is appropriate to the effects of the problems encountered.
The results of corrective action are presented for management review.
The documented procedure for corrective action defines the requirements for…
- reviewing nonconformities (including customer complaints
- determining the causes of nonconformity
- evaluating the need for actions to ensure that nonconformities do not recur
- determining and implementing the corrective action needed
- reviewing and recording corrective action taken
A Typical Procedure for Corrective Action
Acme
Operating Procedure
Title: Corrective Action
No. 14.1 Rev. A Page 1 of 2
Approved by: Little Johnny
Date: XX-XX-04
SCOPE:
This procedure applies to corrective action for customer complaints, internal quality
audit findings, internal product and process nonconformance and supplier nonconformance.
1.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUESTED
Corrective action can be requested by any person within the Acme organization by
requesting a corrective/preventive action request (C.A.R.) form from Q.A.
The initiator provides Q.A. with the information to fill a C.A.R. form.
Q.A. logs in the C.A.R. in the corrective action file and assigns a C.A.R. number.
The Q.A. Manager assigns the corrective action to the appropriate area manager.
2.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION
Corrective action is performed by the person or supplier receiving the C.A.R. to correct
the root cause of the problem which caused the nonconformance.
Root cause analysis is necessary to prevent recurrence of the problem, or the corrective
action is not considered acceptable.
All necessary corrective action steps are taken to correct the process after the root
cause of the problem is discovered.
Corrective action steps may include any of the following:
- Training
- Revision of documentation (i.e. drawings, procedures, work instruction, etc.)
- Changes in the process
After the area manager or supplier is satisfied that the corrective action is sufficient,
the area manager or supplier fills out the corrective action section of the corrective
action request form and gives it to the Q.A. Manager for review.
3.0 ACCEPTABLE?
No - go to 3.1
Yes - go to 4.0
3.1 REJECT CORRECTIVE ACTION
If the Q.A. Manager determines that the corrrective action does not include sufficient
root cause analysis and effectiveness verification, the area manager or supplier must
perform additional work to correct the source of the nonconformance.
4.0 CLOSE OUT CORRECTIVE ACTION
After the Q.A. Manager determines that the corrective action is complete, adequate and
effective, the C.A.R. form is signed and accepted by the Q.A. Manager.
The C.A.R. form is filed in Q.A. along with any other accompanying documentation. The
completed C.A.R. form is retained by Q.A. as a quality record.
Notes:
- Acme shall respond to customers in the customer prescribed format. If a customer
has a specific format or instructions to be followed for corrective actions, Acme
shall respond as required.
- Customer corrective actions are faxed or emailed to the customer.
- The Q.A. Manager will determine the appropriate methods for problem solving using
scrap reports, production data, similar part/process review, and a monthly cross-functional
team.
- When applicable, Acme will use mistake proofing methods and apply corrective action
to similar products and/or processes that may be effected.
Acme
Corrective/Preventive Action Request
Corrective Action No.
Date Issued
Issued To
|
Initiated By
Completion Due Date
|
Description of Nonconformance
Immediate Corrective Action
Root Cause
Permanent Corrective Action
Effectiveness Verification
|
Approved by
Date
|
Summary
Please remember…the existence of your company is dependent on your ability to
deliver quality products and services that get to our customer on time. When problems
arise such as nonconforming product, customer complaints or audit findings, we need to
correct the root cause of the problem to prevent recurrence.
Here are copies of the Corrective Action sample documents in PDF format:
Corrective Action Operating Procedure
Corrective/Preventive Action Request
I hope this information helps you with your transition. Feel free to contact me with any
questions at 800-959-0632.
Neal Stiemert
President
Independent Quality Consultants, Inc.
About the Author
Neal D. Stiemert is President of Independent Quality Consultants, Inc. and holds a
Bachelor of Science degree from Indiana University school of business. Neal is an ASQ Certified
Quality Engineer, a certified lead auditor and has over 24 years of management, auditing, consulting
and training experience in the quality profession.
Neal has served as an examiner for the Minnesota Quality Award, an SPC instructor at Purdue
University and an officer and committee member in the Chicago and Minnesota sections of ASQ.
Neal also conducts registration audits for Smithers Quality Assessments and SAI Global Assurance
Services.
Comment on this article
|
|
|