|
We often focus on the symptoms of a problem without ever
delving deep enough to find its true cause. Yet if we do not find and
eliminate the cause then we are doomed to face the same problem again
and again. Possible production problems include
having trouble finding the right tools, fixtures, supplies or equipment
required to run a job. Another common scenario is parts piling up at the
inspection station, waiting for rework or other disposition
instructions. These are symptoms or visible outcomes of problems within
a company. A simple technique can help us get past the symptoms and
focus on the root causes of the problems. A “cause-and-effect” diagram
is one such technique.
 |
| This cause-and-effect diagram
shows why a machine is not making parts. |
A cause-and-effect diagram is an effective means of
analyzing all possible causes of a problem so that all factors can be
studied. In this type of diagram, a long horizontal arrow is used to
describe the problem being analyzed. Expected causes of the problem are
shown as radial lines stemming from the first horizontal line. Potential
origins for these causes are then shown as horizontal lines extending
from the radial lines. If the chart is developed further, then potential
sources for other causes are shown as more radial lines originating from
the last horizontal line. Although the diagram is a simple tool, it
presents all of the necessary information in a clear, logical manner so
everyone can evaluate what is causing the problem.
Let’s diagram a problem regarding machine
availability. The machine is down, so that is the focal point of our
diagram. In the figure on the preceding page, we show four primary
causes as radial lines off the first horizontal line describing the
problem “Machine not making parts.” These causes are 1) machine
breakdown; 2) machine stopped/waiting for workpiece inspection; 3)
machine being set up; and 4) no operator to run machine. As these
“causes” are identified, sources of these causes must now be determined.
The first ultimate root cause shown on the diagram is
associated with the “can’t find fixture” cause and identified as “poor
fixture organization.” This root cause has now been identified and needs
to be addressed by the company. Other root causes (not shown on the
diagram) could surface upon further analysis. For example, on the
“breakdown” line, we see that the company does not possess any spare
parts. This means that the machine could sit idle for a significant
period of time. The solution would be to review the parts that typically
need replacement and maintain a small inventory to reduce repair delays.
In addition, this company’s policy of stopping the machine while the
first piece undergoes inspection could itself be a root cause of the
machine not making parts. The solution would be to evaluate this current
policy, comparing the lost machine time against the risk of a bad part
being sent to first-piece inspection.
A company can use the cause-and-effect diagram to plan
and manage permanent corrective action on machine downtime and other
crucial problems we all face.
Article courtesy of MMS Online
Comment on this article

|